We have Jac Fitz-Enz as one of our members, and he's got a perspective on bechmarking that I find quite refreshing, particularly as it applies to employee survey data. My own take is that comparing your survey data from today to a lot of accumulated data from the last few years (and many, many in some cases) really does not make sense. You would not compare your company's stock price today with the stock price of your competition from the last 4 years. So why does the practice persist? Are companies out there really getting high value from it? Are decisions based on this type of benchmarking helping impact the bottom line? Jac - can you explain your point of view?
Tags:
Share
Facebook